Theoretical and Natural Science
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Mathematical Physics and Computational Simulation
Series Vol. 12 , 17 November 2023
Open
Access | Article
Computable bibliography: Using data analysis and data visualization to characterize a bibliography
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The Scopus database, which includes many open-access items, conference papers, funding details, and patent linkages, has developed as a vital resource within the dynamic social and economic environment. Gaining popularity in several fields, systematic reviews synthesize the relevant research literature in order to guide deliberative judgments. However, researchers require assistance in keeping up with the ever-increasing multidisciplinary nature of work and the ever-changing nature of information. Researchers need efficient methods to navigate and leverage the wealth of available knowledge for their systematic review processes as the number of scholarly production grows tremendously. This study employs descriptive statistics to examine and graphically present the bibliography (the list of sources cited in the text). This study was conducted in Dr. Jodi Schneider's lab and aims to identify trends in scholarly publishing and evaluate the overall content of scholarly works. Publication dates, item types, author lists, titles, and keywords are examined in the analysis, which takes CSV(Comma Separated Values), BibTeX, or RIS formats as input. Emerging research fields and patterns of collaboration can be better understood with the help of the descriptive statistics generated. Word clouds also help readers evaluate the quality and topic focus of the papers by providing a visual assessment of the paper's composition.
Keywords
data visualization, bibliography, data analysis
References
1. Bannach-Brown, A. et al. 2018. “The Use of Text-Mining and Machine Learning Algorithms in Systematic Reviews: Reducing Workload in Preclinical Biomedical Sciences and Reducing Human Screening Error.” : 255760. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/255760v1 (June 20, 2023).
2. Börner, Katy, Andreas Bueckle, and Michael Ginda. 2019. “Data Visualization Literacy: Definitions, Conceptual Frameworks, Exercises, and Assessments.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(6): 1857–64.
3. “Graphical Abstracts | Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication.” https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2775441.2775465 (June 20, 2023).
4. Hsiao, Tzu-Kun, Yuanxi Fu, and Jodi Schneider. 2020. “Visualizing Evidence-Based Disagreement over Time: The Landscape of a Public Health Controversy 2002–2014.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 57(1): e315.
5. “Is There an Optimum Number Needed to Retrieve to Justify Inclusion of a Database in a Systematic Review Search? - Ross‐White - 2017 - Health Information & Libraries Journal - Wiley Online Library.” https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.proxy2.library.illinois.edu/doi/full/10. 1111/hir.12185 (June 20, 2023).
6. Lehane, Elaine et al. 2019. “Evidence-Based Practice Education for Healthcare Professions: An Expert View.” BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 24(3): 103–8.
7. Midway, Stephen R. 2020. “Principles of Effective Data Visualization.” Patterns 1(9): 100141.
8. O’Mara-Eves, Alison et al. 2015. “Using Text Mining for Study Identification in Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Review of Current Approaches.” Systematic Reviews 4(1): 5.
9. Prather, Kimberly A. et al. 2020. “Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2.” Science 370(6514): 303–4.
10. “Scopus | The Largest Database of Peer-Reviewed Literature | Elsevier.” https://www.elsevier. com/en-gb/solutions/scopus (June 20, 2023).
11. Siddaway, Andy P., Alex M. Wood, and Larry V. Hedges. 2019. “How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses.” Annual Review of Psychology 70: 747–70.
12. Trinquart, Ludovic, David Merritt Johns, and Sandro Galea. 2016. “Why Do We Think We Know What We Know? A Metaknowledge Analysis of the Salt Controversy.” International Journal of Epidemiology 45(1): 251–60.
13. Yu, Xiao, Quanquan Gu, Mianwei Zhou, and Jiawei Han. 2012. “Citation Prediction in Heterogeneous Bibliographic Networks.” In Proceedings of the 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), Proceedings, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1119–30. https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/1.9781611972825.96 (June 20, 2023).
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).
- Volume Title
- Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Mathematical Physics and Computational Simulation
- ISBN (Print)
- 978-1-83558-135-3
- ISBN (Online)
- 978-1-83558-136-0
- Published Date
- 17 November 2023
- Series
- Theoretical and Natural Science
- ISSN (Print)
- 2753-8818
- ISSN (Online)
- 2753-8826
- DOI
- 10.54254/2753-8818/12/20230433
- Copyright
- © 2023 The Author(s)
- Open Access
- This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited