Theoretical and Natural Science

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Theoretical and Natural Science

Vol. 23, 20 December 2023


Open Access | Article

Research on the progress of neurorehabilitation

Yao Xiao * 1
1 Xi’an Jiaotong University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Theoretical and Natural Science, Vol. 23, 44-51
Published 20 December 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Yao Xiao. Research on the progress of neurorehabilitation. TNS (2023) Vol. 23: 44-51. DOI: 10.54254/2753-8818/23/20231020.

Abstract

With the intensification of global aging problems, the incidence of central nervous system diseases such as stroke is getting higher and higher. At the same time, the number of disabled people has also increased. Amputation and neurological diseases are important causes of disability, and neurorehabilitation is an important method for restoring the nervous function and autonomous movement ability of the disabled. At present, neurorehabilitation methods commonly used in clinical treatment mainly include: wearing prosthetic limbs, functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy, rehabilitation robots, and so on. The prosthetic limb refers to an artificial device used to replace the function of a lost limb. Many advanced technologies are being used to improve the motion control of prosthetics to achieve natural movement. FES is a technique that can improve physiological function or treat diseases by stimulating nerves or tissues through current, and has become one of the important means to promote nerve regeneration and restore motor function. Rehabilitation robots are the equipment that uses mechanical devices and advanced control technology to assist rehabilitation treatment and functional recovery. This article mainly discusses the current research progresses of prosthetic limbs, EFS and rehabilitation robots, so as to promote the development of neurorehabilitation.

Keywords

neurorehabilitation, prosthetic limb, functional electrical stimulation, rehabilitation robots

References

1. WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health. (2013).

2. Tu, W.J., et al., "Prevalence of stroke in China, 2013-2019: A population-based study," Lancet Reg Health West Pac 28, 100550 (2022).

3. Wang, W., et al., "Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Stroke in China: Results from a Nationwide Population-Based Survey of 480 687 Adults," Circulation 135(8), 759-771 (2017).

4. WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cord-injury. (2013).

5. Ona, E.D., et al., "A Review of Robotics in Neurorehabilitation: Towards an Automated Process for Upper Limb," J Healthc Eng 2018, 9758939 (2018).

6. Ekker, M.S., et al., "Neurorehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: Future perspectives for behavioural adaptation," Parkinsonism Relat Disord 22 Suppl 1, S73-7 (2016).

7. Tabernig, C.B., et al., "Neurorehabilitation therapy of patients with severe stroke based on functional electrical stimulation commanded by a brain computer interface," J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng 5, 2055668318789280 (2018).

8. Hu, T., Gao, Z. and Chen, Z., "Research Advances and Prospects on Rehabilitation Engineering," Chinese Journal of Medical lnstrumentation 28(1), 1-3 (2004).

9. Krausz, N.E., et al., "Intent Prediction Based on Biomechanical Coordination of EMG and Vision-Filtered Gaze for End-Point Control of an Arm Prosthesis," IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 28(6), 1471-1480 (2020).

10. Popovic, M.R., Masani, K. and Micera, S., "Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy: Recovery of Function Following Spinal Cord Injury and Stroke," Neurorehabilitation Technology. 105-121. (2012)

11. Jin, D., Ji, L. and Zhang, J., "New progress in rehabilitation engineering research," Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 16(6), 328-330 (2001).

12. Shi, D., et al., "A Review on Lower Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Robots," Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 32(1) (2019).

13. Wandercraft. http://www.wandercraft.eu. (2018).

14. Plaza, A., et al., "Lower-Limb Medical and Rehabilitation Exoskeletons: A Review of the Current Designs," IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 16, 278-291 (2023).

15. Hamner, S.R., Narayan, V.G. and Donaldson, K.M., "Designing for scale: development of the ReMotion Knee for global emerging markets," Ann Biomed Eng 41(9), 1851-9 (2013).

16. Nadjib, B.L., Bilal, C. and Karima, R., EMG-Based Hand gesture recognition for myoelectric prosthetic hand control, 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security Systems and Privacy (AI-CSP). 1-6. (2021)

17. Gao, H., et al., "EEG-based volitional control of prosthetic legs for walking in different terrains," IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 18(2), 530-540 (2019).

18. Mastinu, E., et al., "Grip control and motor coordination with implanted and surface electrodes while grasping with an osseointegrated prosthetic hand," Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 16(1) (2019).

19. Valle, G., et al., "Mechanisms of neuro-robotic prosthesis operation in leg amputees," Science Advances 7(17), eabd8354 (2021).

20. Ertelt, D., et al., "Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke," Neuroimage 36, T164-T173 (2007).

21. Müller-Putz, G.R., et al., "EEG-based neuroprosthesis control: a step towards clinical practice," Neuroscience letters 382(1-2), 169-174 (2005).

22. Kim, T., Kim, S. and Lee, B., "Effects of Action Observational Training Plus Brain-Computer Interface-Based Functional Electrical Stimulation on Paretic Arm Motor Recovery in Patient with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Occup Ther Int 23(1), 39-47 (2016).

23. Selfslagh, A., et al., "Non-invasive, Brain-controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Locomotion Rehabilitation in Individuals with Paraplegia," Sci Rep 9(1), 6782 (2019).

24. Perry, J., et al., "Classification of Walking Handicap in the Stroke Population."

25. Street, T., Taylor, P. and Swain, I., "Effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation on walking speed, functional walking category, and clinically meaningful changes for people with multiple sclerosis," Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96(4), 667-72 (2015).

26. Qian, Z. and Bi, Z., "Recent development of rehabilitation robots," Advances in Mechanical Engineering 7(2), 563062 (2015).

27. Subasi, A., "Electromyogram-controlled assistive devices," Bioelectronics and Medical Devices, Elsevier. 285-311. (2019)

28. Qassim, H.M. and Wan Hasan, W.Z., "A Review on Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robots," Applied Sciences 10(19) (2020).

29. Ruiz-Olaya, A.F., Burgos, C.A.Q. and Londoño, L.T., "A Low-Cost Arm Robotic Platform based on Myoelectric Control for Rehabilitation Engineering." in 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON). IEEE (2019).

30. Wang, D., et al., "Design and Development of a Portable Exoskeleton for Hand Rehabilitation," IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 26(12), 2376-2386 (2018).

31. Vaida, C., et al., "Systematic Design of a Parallel Robotic System for Lower Limb Rehabilitation," IEEE Access 8, 34522-34537 (2020).

32. Inc., C. https://www.cyberdyne.jp/english/. (2018).

33. Bionics, E. https://eksobionics.com/. (2018).

34. Laut, J., Porfiri, M. and Raghavan, P., "The Present and Future of Robotic Technology in Rehabilitation," Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 4(4), 312-319 (2016).

35. Barrios-Muriel, J., et al., "Advances in Orthotic and Prosthetic Manufacturing: A Technology Review," Materials (Basel) 13(2) (2020).

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biological Engineering and Medical Science
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-219-0
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-220-6
Published Date
20 December 2023
Series
Theoretical and Natural Science
ISSN (Print)
2753-8818
ISSN (Online)
2753-8826
DOI
10.54254/2753-8818/23/20231020
Copyright
20 December 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated