Theoretical and Natural Science

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Theoretical and Natural Science

Vol. 34, 11 July 2024


Open Access | Article

Reproduction of two studies discussing bias: Jury selection bias and Diving2000 findings

Jiaqi Guo 1 , Yunhao Mai 2 , Chen Wang 3 , Chentong Hao * 4 , Zilong Wang 5
1 University of Wisconsin Madison
2 Columbia University
3 New York University
4 Tianjin University
5 Wuhan Britain-China School

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Theoretical and Natural Science, Vol. 34, 342-350
Published 11 July 2024. © 11 July 2024 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Jiaqi Guo, Yunhao Mai, Chen Wang, Chentong Hao, Zilong Wang. Reproduction of two studies discussing bias: Jury selection bias and Diving2000 findings. TNS (2024) Vol. 34: 342-350. DOI: 10.54254/2753-8818/34/20240761.

Abstract

Unveiling the truths behind biases in critical decision-making processes has been an enduring challenge in various domains. This reproduction study endeavors to shed light on two intriguing topics: potential bias against education in jury selection and nationalistic judging in the 2000 Olympic diving competition. By rigorously reproducing influential papers and employing sophisticated statistical tools like t-tests and permutation tests, we aim to contribute robust evidence to the ongoing discourse on bias. Our findings challenge prevailing theories by revealing no statistically significant evidence of biases against education in jury selection, providing invaluable insights for policy discussions. Simultaneously, our investigation into nationalistic judging uncovers the presence of bias among certain judges, highlighting the impact on highly competitive events’ outcomes. As we delve into these compelling issues, our study reinforces the critical importance of impartiality in decision-making processes, offering key contributions to the understanding of biases and their implications in various domains. Our primary purpose in this paper is to precisely test the reproducibility of the methods employed in the original influential papers. By carefully reproducing their analyses using advanced statistical techniques like t-tests and permutation tests, we find that the reproducibility of both papers is quite high.

Keywords

bias, reproducibility, t-test, permutation-test, Jury selection, Nationalistic judging

References

1. Levin H Y, Emerson J. Is There a Bias Against Education in the Jury Selection Process?[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2006, 38(3).

2. Emerson, J.W. and Meredith, S., 2011. Nationalistic judging bias in the 2000 Olympic diving competition. Math Horizons, 18(3).DOI: 10.4169/194762111X12954578042812.

3. Null R C T R, Team R, Null R C T, et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing[J]. Computing, 2011, 1:12-21. DOI:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[3097:CFHIWS] 2.0.CO;2.

4. Reider, B. J ury Selection[J]. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2006, 34(4):541-541.DOI:10.1177/0363546506287183.

5. Zitzewitz E. Nationalism in Winter Sports Judging and Its Lessons for Organizational Decision Making[J].Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2006, 15(1):67–99.DOI:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00092.x.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computing Innovation and Applied Physics
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-369-2
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-370-8
Published Date
11 July 2024
Series
Theoretical and Natural Science
ISSN (Print)
2753-8818
ISSN (Online)
2753-8826
DOI
10.54254/2753-8818/34/20240761
Copyright
11 July 2024
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated