Theoretical and Natural Science
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 30, 24 January 2024
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper undertakes a historical investigation of the separate and independent development of calculus by Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz in the late 17th century. Through analysis of primary sources and historiographical perspectives, it explores the differences in notation, methods, and applications used by each mathematician to formulate foundational concepts of calculus. The research demonstrates that Newton relied more on geometric intuition, developing calculus concepts like fluxions and fluents rooted in kinematic problems. His 1687 Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica synthesized many calculus innovations. Meanwhile, Leibniz approached calculus from an algebraic mindset, utilizing infinitesimal differentials and comprehensively explaining integral and differential calculus in publications like Nova Methodus pro Maximis et Minimis. Evaluation of letters and documents from the 1670s and 1680s shows no direct collaboration or communication about calculus between Newton and Leibniz. This lack of transmission, coupled with the disparities in their notation and calculus techniques, provides evidence for independent creation. However, Newton and Leibniz shared key insights regarding rates of change, derivatives and integrals, hinting at a broader zeitgeist in early modern mathematics and science. Thus, this dual achievement illustrates how the Scientific Revolution facilitated conceptual convergence despite geographic separation between great thinkers. Investigating this case study offers perspective on the interplay between individual genius and wider social contexts in driving scientific progress. This paper concludes by assessing the legacy of the Newton-Leibniz debate over priority and analyzing work that paved the way for modern unified calculus notation and applications.
Mathematics, Contrasting Perspectives, Geometric, Algebraic 1. Introduction
1. Yanfang L,Shuyan M,Xiaoye J, et al. Independent development and validation of a novel six-color fluorescence multiplex panel including 61 diallelic DIPs and 2 miniSTRs for forensic degradation sample.[J]. Electrophoresis,2022,43(13-14).
2. Jessica E,Chavez C,Amie R, et al. ITK independent development of Th17 responses during hypersensitivity pneumonitis driven lung inflammation[J]. Communications Biology,2022,5(1).
3. Islombek N M,N. J,K. N, et al. The way of independent development - A key factor of national revival and progress of Uzbekistan[J]. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal,2022,12(2).
4. Enxing Z,Zenghui Y,Guotian L, et al. Research on quality evaluation of lubricating oil based on China’s independent development[J]. E3S Web of Conferences,2022,360.
5. Dongju C,Minghui S,Pei M, et al. GSA: an independent development algorithm for calling copy number and detecting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) from target capture sequencing[J]. BMC Bioinformatics,2021,22(1).
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).