Theoretical and Natural Science

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Theoretical and Natural Science

Vol. 28, 26 December 2023


Open Access | Article

It is generally impossible to determine whether a rational point lies in the interior or on the boundary of a closed set algorithmically

Baiqing Liu 1 , Xinyao Zhu * 2
1 Xi’an Jiaotong University
2 WLSA Shanghai Academy

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Theoretical and Natural Science, Vol. 28, 151-155
Published 26 December 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Baiqing Liu, Xinyao Zhu. It is generally impossible to determine whether a rational point lies in the interior or on the boundary of a closed set algorithmically. TNS (2023) Vol. 28: 151-155. DOI: 10.54254/2753-8818/28/20230399.

Abstract

It seems true that we can almost always determine the position of a specific point when a set is given. Namely, we could assert whether this point lies at this set's interior, boundary, or exterior. However, this is not always the case in constructive mathematics. In this research, we will show that it is generally impossible to algorithmically determine whether a rational point lies in the interior of a closed productive set or on the boundary of it. We conduct our proof by making contradictions. Firstly, We used an unextendible algorithm to construct a rational point and a closed set on the natural line. Secondly, we reformulate the assumption "we could decide whether the point lies in the interior or on the boundary of a closed set” to “we could determine the program will eventually print 1". Thirdly, we constructed an extension of the program to all the positive integers, which is a contradiction to our assumption. Hence, we concluded that it is impossible to figure out the position of the rational point algorithmically.

Keywords

Unextendible Program, Constructive Mathematics, Closed Set, Rational Point

References

1. Bishop, E. Beeson, M. (2013). Foundations of constructive analysis. Ishi Press International.

2. Mints, G. E.: 1983, 'Stepwise Semantics of A. A. Markov' (Russian), a supplement to the Russian translation of the Handbook of Mathematical Logic, Nauka, Moscow, part IV, pp. 348-357.

3. Shanin N.A., “A hierarchy of ways of understanding judgments in constructive mathematics”, Problems of the constructive direction in mathematics. Part 6, Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov., 129, 1973, 203–266; Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 129 (1973), 209–271.

4. Kushner, B. A. (1985). Lectures on constructive mathematical analysis. American Mathematical Society.

5. Mandelkern, M. “Constructive Mathematics.” Mathematics Magazine, vol. 58, no. 5, 1985, pp. 272–80.

6. Turing, A. M. (1936). On Computable Numbers, with An Application to the Entscheidungs problem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42, 1936.

7. Shen, A., and Vereshchagin N.K. Computable Functions. AMS Press, 2003.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Mathematical Physics and Computational Simulation
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-261-9
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-262-6
Published Date
26 December 2023
Series
Theoretical and Natural Science
ISSN (Print)
2753-8818
ISSN (Online)
2753-8826
DOI
10.54254/2753-8818/28/20230399
Copyright
26 December 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated