Theoretical and Natural Science

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Theoretical and Natural Science

Vol. 18, 08 December 2023


Open Access | Article

The impact of AGV application on port operating efficiency

Qiuyu Chen * 1
1 Hunan University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Theoretical and Natural Science, Vol. 18, 19-29
Published 08 December 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Qiuyu Chen. The impact of AGV application on port operating efficiency. TNS (2023) Vol. 18: 19-29. DOI: 10.54254/2753-8818/18/20230278.

Abstract

This paper analyses the application of Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) in ports and evaluates the 20 ports' efficiency with the consideration of AGV application. Using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method and the simulated data, this paper further identifies the optimal number of AGVs for these 20 ports. The DEA-CCR and DEA-BCC results show that most of these 20 ports are already efficient. And Ningbo port, Osaka port, and Hamburg port are the most efficient port as they obtained the highest scores in super-efficiency analysis. But using the simulation data, the result suggests that some ports, such as Busan Port and Antwerp Port, are able to improve their efficiency by adjusting the application of AGV. The finding of this paper suggests that existing automated port can improve their economic efficiency by reducing the number of AGVs, or enhancing their service efficiency by increasing the application of AGVs. But for traditional ports, expanding the application of AGV can increase both port economic and service efficiency.

Keywords

DEA, AGV, port efficiency, automated port

References

1. Héctor J. Carlo,Iris F.A. Vis and Kees Jan Roodbergen 2014. Transport operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme. European Journal of Operational Research. 236 1.

2. Vrakas George,Chan Caroline and Thai Vinh V 2021. The effects of evolving port technology and process optimisation on operational performance: The case study of an Australian container terminal operator. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 37 281.

3. AlKheder Sharaf, Naif Dana, Musaed Dana, Al Shrekah Shoug, Al Rshaid Munira, Al. Anzi Nada and Baqer Isra'a 2022. Maritime transport management in Kuwait toward an automated port logistical city. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain. 3 1000.

4. Garrido Salsas Javier,Saurí Sergi,Rúa Carles and Torrent Jordi 2022. Conceptualisation of the Port of the Future based on the Business Canvas Model: Case study of the Vision 2040 for Barcelona. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 10 1427.

5. Xiang Xi and Liu Changchun 2021. Modeling and analysis for an automated container terminal considering battery management. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 156 107258.

6. Li Xiangda,Peng Yun,Huang Jun,Wang Wenyuan and Song Xiangqun 2021. Simulation study on terminal layout in automated container terminals from efficiency, economic and environment perspectives. Ocean and Coastal Management. 213 105882.

7. Houjun Lu and Sai Wang 2019. A study on multi-ASC scheduling method of automated container terminals based on graph theory.Computers & Industrial Engineering.129 404.

8. Nikola Kutin, Thanh ThuyNguyen and Thomas Vallée 2017.Relative Efficiencies of ASEAN Container Ports based on Data Envelopment Analysis. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics.33 67.

9. Nguyen Thi Le Hang, Park Sung-Hoon,Kim Yuna and Yeo Gi-Tae 2021. An efficiency analysis of container terminals in Southern Vietnam using DEA dynamic efficiency evaluation. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics.37 329.

10. Jiabin Luo, Yue Wu and André Bergsten Mendes 2016. Modelling of integrated vehicle scheduling and container storage problems in unloading process at an automated container terminal. Computers & Industrial Engineering.94 32.

11. Chin-I. Liu,Hossein Jula and Petros A. Ioannou.(2002).Design, simulation, and evaluation of automated container terminals. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems. 1 64.

12. Xuchao Chen, Shiwei He, Yongxiang Zhang and Lu (Carol)Tong 2020. Yard crane and AGV scheduling in automated container terminal: A multi-robot task allocation framework. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.114 241.

13. Kate Forrest, MichaelMac Kinnon and Brian Tarroja 2020. Estimating the technical feasibility of fuel cell and battery electric vehicles for the medium and heavy duty sectors in California. Applied Energy. 276 1154.

14. Ana María Martín-Soberón, Arturo Monfort, Rafael Sapiña and David Calduch 2014. Automation in Port Container Terminals. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 160 195.

15. Jack Xunjie Luo 2019. Fully automatic container terminals of Shanghai Yangshan Port phase IV. Frontiers of Engineering Management. 6 457.

16. Wang Zehao and Zeng Qingcheng 2022. A branch-and-bound approach for AGV dispatching and routing problems in automated container terminals. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 166 107968.

17. Meisu Zhong, Yongsheng Yang and Yasser Dessouky 2020.Multi-AGV scheduling for conflict-free path planning in automated container terminals. Computers & Industrial Engineering.142 1063.

18. Vis, I. F. A., and Harika, I 2004. Comparison of vehicle types at an automated container terminal. OR Spectrum. 26 143.

19. Ning Ma, Chenhao Zhou and Aloisius Stephen 2021. Simulation model and performance evaluation of battery-powered AGV systems in automated container terminals. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory(prepublish). 106 102146.

20. Xin Jianbin, Negenborn Rudy R. and Lodewijks Gabriel 2014. Rescheduling of interacting machines in automated container terminals. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 47 1698.

21. A.CharnesW.W and CooperE.Rhodes 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2 429.

22. Roll and Y. Hayuth 1993. Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). Maritime Policy & Management. 20 153.

23. R.D.Banker A.CharnesW.W. and Cooper R.Clarke 1989. Constrained game formulations and interpretations for data envelopment analysis.European Journal of Operational Research. 40 299.

24. Golany B and Roll Y 1989. An application procedure for DEA. Omega. 17 237.

25. James Odeckac and Halvor Schøyen 2020.Productivity and convergence in Norwegian container seaports: An SFA-based Malmquist productivity index approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 137 222.

26. Densberger Nicole Light and Bachkar Khalid 2022. Towards accelerating the adoption of zero emissions cargo handling technologies in California ports: Lessons learned from the case of the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 347 131255.

27. Kevin Cullinane, Dong-Wook Song, Ping Ji and Teng-Fei Wang 2011. An Application of DEA Windows Analysis to Container Port Production Efficiency. Review of Network Economics.3 46.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing Innovation and Applied Physics
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-201-5
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-202-2
Published Date
08 December 2023
Series
Theoretical and Natural Science
ISSN (Print)
2753-8818
ISSN (Online)
2753-8826
DOI
10.54254/2753-8818/18/20230278
Copyright
08 December 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated