Theoretical and Natural Science
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 13, 30 November 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The drive to attain ever higher speeds, to be able to travel ever faster fuels the research and development for a commercial supersonic aircraft. This has previously led to the Concorde which travelled at more than twice the speed of sound. Now, in addition to business considerations about economic viability, supersonic aircraft must be quieter and emit less emissions. Considering the 20 years that have elapsed since Concorde’s retirement, this study aims to reevaluate the current challenges and limitations to achieving commercial supersonic flight again, in the context of noise. Identifying sonic booms and jet exhaust noise as two main challenges, it reviews current shape optimization methods, plasma as a sonic boom mitigator, sonic boom circumvention, chevron nozzles, variable cycle engines, engine positioning, and their corresponding limitations. Some of the methods have been refined for use and application in final stage design and manufacture of certain supersonic aircraft which indicates a certain feasibility.
Supersonic, Sonic Boom, Jet Exhaust Noise, Commercial Jet
1. Banerjee, T. (2019). Design Guidelines for Supersonic Aircrafts in Civil Aviation. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1430
2. Li, W., & Geiselhart, K. (2021). Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Low-Boom Supersonic Aircraft with Mission Constraints. AIAA Journal, 59(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/ 10.2514/1.j059237
3. Ph, & Student. (2018). School of Aerospace Transport and Manufacturing, AIAA Student Member. 2 Professor, School of Aerospace Transport and Manufacturing. 2018–3278. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3278
4. Lavelle, T., & Curlett, B. (1994). Graphical User Interface for the NASA FLOPS Aircraft Performance and Sizing Code • National Aeronautics and Space Administration. In NASA Technical Memorandum (p. 106649). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19950008190/ downloads/19950008190.pdf
5. Quieting the Sonic Boom X-59 Quiet Supersonic Technology X-Plane. (n.d.). https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/aero/documents/quietSuperS onic/P22-01661%20Product%20Card%20X-59.pdf
6. Khasdeo, N. (2007). Sonic Boom Focusing Prediction and Delta Wing Shape Sonic Boom Focusing Prediction and Delta Wing Shape Optimization for Boom Mitigation Studies Optimization for Boom Mitigation Studies. https://doi.org/10.25777/hx9q-ja15
7. Blankson, I. (2016). Aerospace Applications of Non- Equilibrium Plasma AIAA AVIATION 2016: INVITED SESSION SESSION 264-FD-60: IDENTIFYING THE IMPACT OF NON- EQUILIBRIUM MECHANISMS IN ENGINEERING FLOWS. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/ api/citations/20170002538/downloads/20170002538.pdf
8. Boom Supersonic. (2019). Boom - Overture. Boomsupersonic.com. https://boomsupersonic. com/overture
9. Noise Control/Supression. (2020). Purdue.edu. https://engineering.purdue.edu/~propulsi/ propulsion/jets/basics/noise.html
10. Reducing Jet Noise with Chevron Nozzles. (2017, April 26). Gauss Centre for Supercomputing E.V. https://www.gauss-centre.eu/results/computational-and-scientific-engineering/reducing-jet-noise-with-chevron-nozzles
11. Cican, G., Deaconu, M., & Crunteanu, D.-E. (2021). Impact of Using Chevrons Nozzle on the Acoustics and Performances of a Micro Turbojet Engine. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 5158. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115158
12. Wernet, J., & Bridges. (2021). Mark P Characterization of Chevron Nozzle Performance. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210020164/downloads/TM-20210020164.pdf
13. Ansgar Niemöller, Meinke, M., Schroeder, W., Albring, T., & Gauger, N. R. (2019). Noise Reduction Using a Direct-Hybrid CFD/CAA Method. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-2579
14. Heeb, N., Gutmark, E., & Kailasanath, K. (2016). Impact of chevron spacing and asymmetric distribution on supersonic jet acoustics and flow. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 370, 54–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.01.047
15. Callender, B., Gutmark, E., & Martens, S. (2005). Far-Field Acoustic Investigation into Chevron Nozzle Mechanisms and Trends. AIAA Journal, 43(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.6150
16. Federal Airport Noise Regulations and Programs. (2021). https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R46920.pdf
17. Concorde: technical feat, financial fiasco. (n.d.). Phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2019-03-concorde-technical-feat-financial-fiasco.html
18. Denney, R. K., Tai, J. C., Kestner, B. K., & Mavris, D. N. (2005). Variable Cycle Optimization for Supersonic Commercial Applications. SAE Transactions, 114, 1354–1361. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44682832
19. Noise-Reduction Benefits Analyzed for Over-the-Wing-Mounted Advanced Turbofan Engines. (n.d.). Retrieved August 6, 2023, from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20050192097/ downloads/20050192097.pdf
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).